<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Sin and Syntax &#187; e-books</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sinandsyntax.com/tag/e-books/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sinandsyntax.com</link>
	<description>An online salon for those who love wicked good prose.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 04:06:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>A-lists, e-books, and the iPad</title>
		<link>http://www.sinandsyntax.com/blog/a-lists-e-books-and-the-ipad/</link>
		<comments>http://www.sinandsyntax.com/blog/a-lists-e-books-and-the-ipad/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Apr 2010 15:31:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Constance Hale</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e-books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e-readers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lukas Prize]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[narrative journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[role of the narrator]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tips on writing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sinandsyntax.com/?p=646</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Some chewy bits and pieces to offer you this week. First, kudos to David Finkel, whose book The Good Soldiers was just named the recipient of the Anthony Lukas prize. I’ve long been an admirer of Finkel’s narrative journalism, which came to my attention when I edited the Nieman Foundation's Narrative Digest. The Good Soldiers offers an interesting counterpoint to The Forever War, by Dexter Filkins.

How will books like these fare in the future, as traditional publishing adapts to new technology? Read  about that and a list of tips from a writer/editor pal of mine in California.


Related posts:<ol><li><a href='http://www.sinandsyntax.com/blog/try-a-little-frisson-with-your-nonfiction/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Try a Little Frisson with Your Nonfiction'>Try a Little Frisson with Your Nonfiction</a></li>
<li><a href='http://www.sinandsyntax.com/blog/constance-hale-on-demystifying-books/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Demystifying Books'>Demystifying Books</a></li>
<li><a href='http://www.sinandsyntax.com/blog/e-books-twit-wit-and-susan-orlean/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: E-books, twit wit, and Susan Orlean'>E-books, twit wit, and Susan Orlean</a></li>
</ol>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some chewy bits and pieces to offer you this week. First, kudos to David Finkel, whose book <em><a href="http://www.amazon.com/Good-Soldiers-David-Finkel/dp/0374165734/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&amp;s=books&amp;qid=1270220496&amp;sr=1-1 " target="_blank">The Good Soldiers</a> </em>was just named the recipient of the Anthony Lukas prize. I’ve long been an admirer of Finkel’s narrative journalism, which came to my attention when I edited the Nieman Foundation&#8217;s <a href="http://www.nieman.harvard.edu/narrative/notable.aspx?id=100465" target="_blank">Narrative Digest</a>. <em>The Good Soldiers</em> offers an interesting counterpoint to <em><a href="http://www.amazon.com/reader/0307266397?_encoding=UTF8&amp;ref_=sib_dp_pt" target="_blank">The Forever War</a></em>, by Dexter Filkins.</p>
<p>Both books are examples of masterful war reporting, but they also make a study in contrasts about the role of the narrator in nonfiction storytelling. Finkel choses the third person, zooming on his soldier protagonists. (See this <em><a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/09/11/AR2009091102405.html" target="_blank">Washington Post</a></em><a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/09/11/AR2009091102405.html" target="_blank"> excerpt</a>.) Filkins, on the other hand, uses his book to write in a way that is impossible in his <em>New York Times</em> stories, as he explains in “<a href="http://www.prospect.org/cs/articles?article=upclose_and_personal_in_iraq" target="_blank">Up Close and Personal in Iraq</a>,” an article by Ankush Khardori in <em>The American Prospect</em>. Just read the first few pages of each, and you’ll notice the difference in point of view.</p>
<p>How will books like these fare in the future, as traditional publishing adapts to new technology? You may have seen the host of recent news articles about e-books, and you may even be considering buying a brand-new iPad. In the Sin and Syntax Salon, <a href="http://www.sinandsyntax.com/sin-and-syntax-salon/e-to-z-on-e-books/" target="_blank">Sarah Baker gives you the lowdown</a> on what she calls the “chaotic bazaar” of book publishing.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/03/31/books/31covers.html" target="_blank">Motoko Rich</a> also had an interesting (if oddly written—did anyone else think it went in circles?) article about how e-readers kill the fun of looking at what others are reading. Is the Kindle a conversation killer? I once sat next to a handsome guy on a plane who was reading <em><a href="http://www.amazon.com/Mambo-Kings-Play-Songs-Love/dp/1401310028/ref=sr_1_5?ie=UTF8&amp;s=books&amp;qid=1270220683&amp;sr=1-5" target="_blank">The Mambo Kings Play Songs of Love</a></em>. My asking how he liked the book kicked off a conversation that took us to Frankfurt. And it gave me a cool connection in Washington, D.C. (He was a staffer for Congressman John Conyers.)</p>
<p>OK, now back to our conversation about writing. I wanted to share <a href="http://womeninoverdrive.blogspot.com/2010/03/writerly-advice.html" target="_blank">some suggestions</a> from my California colleague Nora Isaacs, who is a terrific journalist as well as a freelance editor.</p>
<p>Nora is good on tips. I appreciated the ones in her book <em><a href="http://bit.ly/c1Xhei" target="_blank">Women in Overdrive</a></em>. And taking some of <em>those</em> tips to heart, I will stop writing and start assembling some literal bits and pieces for a dinner party tonight.</p>


<p>Related posts:<ol><li><a href='http://www.sinandsyntax.com/blog/try-a-little-frisson-with-your-nonfiction/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Try a Little Frisson with Your Nonfiction'>Try a Little Frisson with Your Nonfiction</a></li>
<li><a href='http://www.sinandsyntax.com/blog/constance-hale-on-demystifying-books/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Demystifying Books'>Demystifying Books</a></li>
<li><a href='http://www.sinandsyntax.com/blog/e-books-twit-wit-and-susan-orlean/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: E-books, twit wit, and Susan Orlean'>E-books, twit wit, and Susan Orlean</a></li>
</ol></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.sinandsyntax.com/blog/a-lists-e-books-and-the-ipad/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sarah Baker with an E to Z on e-books</title>
		<link>http://www.sinandsyntax.com/sin-and-syntax-salon/e-to-z-on-e-books/</link>
		<comments>http://www.sinandsyntax.com/sin-and-syntax-salon/e-to-z-on-e-books/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Apr 2010 21:55:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Constance Hale</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Sin and Syntax Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[book contracts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[book publishing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e-books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e-reader]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kindle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sarah Baker]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sinandsyntax.com/?p=635</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Electronic rights are the chaotic bazaar of book publishing. Here authors barter with agents, agents haggle with publishers, and publishers brawl with e-retailers. Everyone is vying for his or her claim on the best pomegranate.

This frenzy, and a barrage of media attention, has left most people involved feeling confused. So what should a writer know in a labyrinth of twisting alleys and ad-hoc product stands? Here are some key terms and general guidelines to the unstable warren of the U.S. market.


Related posts:<ol><li><a href='http://www.sinandsyntax.com/sin-and-syntax-salon/on-bucks-and-books/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Constance Hale on Bucks and Book Publishing'>Constance Hale on Bucks and Book Publishing</a></li>
<li><a href='http://www.sinandsyntax.com/blog/constance-hale-on-demystifying-books/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Demystifying Books'>Demystifying Books</a></li>
<li><a href='http://www.sinandsyntax.com/sin-and-syntax-salon/sarah-baker-on-the-art-of-writing-free/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Sarah Baker on the Art of Writing Free'>Sarah Baker on the Art of Writing Free</a></li>
</ol>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Electronic rights are the chaotic bazaar of book publishing. Here authors barter with agents, agents haggle with publishers, and publishers brawl with e-retailers. Everyone is vying for his or her claim on the best pomegranate.</p>
<p>This frenzy, and a barrage of media attention, has left most people involved feeling confused. Agent Laurie Liss, vice president of Sterling Lord Literistic, says, “I have never felt such a divide between publishers and agents as there is now about electronic rights.” And Mark Gompertz, executive vice president of digital publishing at Simon and Schuster, acknowledges an “anxiety on the publishing side, too. We’re on the threshold of something new.”</p>
<p>So what should a writer know in a labyrinth of twisting alleys and ad-hoc product stands? Here are some key terms and general guidelines to the unstable warren of the U.S. market.</p>
<p><strong>E-book</strong></p>
<p>According to <em>PC Magazine Encyclopedia</em>, an e-book is “the electronic counterpart of a printed book, which can be viewed on a desktop computer or a portable device such as a laptop, PDA or e-book reader.”</p>
<p><strong>E-reader</strong></p>
<p><strong><span style="font-weight: normal;">The <em>Free Dictionary</em> states that an e-reader, or e-book reader, is “a small, portable device onto which the contents of a book in electronic format can be downloaded and read.” Although there are more then two-dozen different brands of e-reader available, the most popular are Amazon’s Kindle, Sony’s Reader, and Barnes and Noble’s Nook. Then there’s Apple’s iPad Tablet, which will be available April 3, 2010.</span></strong></p>
<p><strong><span style="font-weight: normal;"><strong>Enhanced e-books</strong></span></strong></p>
<p>These are e-books with bells and whistles. Think of a DVD—you get the movie plus the option to watch cuts or interviews with the director. An enhanced e-book could include audio, a video interview with the author, passages cut from the final text, slide-shows, or illustrations. You might even be able to click on a recipe, or a footnote, that takes you to a full citation. Enhanced e-books are interactive e-books.</p>
<p><strong>How big is the e-book market?</strong></p>
<p><em>Publisher’s Weekly</em> <a href="http://www.publishersweekly.com/article/450299-E_Book_Sales_Jump_176_in_Flat_Trade_Year.php?rssid=20796&amp;q=e-book+sales" target="_blank">recently reported</a> that “e-book sales from the 13 publishers that report figures to the Association of American Publishers soared 176.6 percent in 2009, to $169.5 million.” The jump in sales increased the e-book’s share of trade sales from 1.2 percent in 2008 to 3.3 percent in 2009. And, five million e-readers sold worldwide in 2009 and an estimated twelve million will be sold in 2010, according to <em><a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704854904574644491659206478.html" target="_blank">The Wall Street Journal</a></em>.</p>
<p><strong>Who is the market?</strong></p>
<p>“Most e-book devices were bought by baby boomers (or older) and, mostly, women,” says Gompertz. At $259 a pop for a Kindle, or around $500 for the iPad, it’s understandable that they are selling to a more mature market. Peter Miller, director of publicity at Bloomsbury Books says that these readers are devouring “genre fiction.” In other words, the e-book market so far is most popular for “people who read for guilty pleasure.”</p>
<p><strong>What should I be aware of in my contract?</strong></p>
<p>Get an agent or have a publishing lawyer check over your contract. “You wouldn’t have your spouse pull your tooth for you,” says agent Wendy Strothman. That isn’t just a plug for her industry; contracts are confusing and if a professional looks at them, you’ll sleep better. Some things to look for in particular:</p>
<ol>
<li>If you have been previously published, now is the time to check your contract to see if you control e-rights, says Liss. In other words, be on top of it.</li>
<li>For new contracts, “publishers will demand e-book rights. “No book publisher will allow e-book rights to be retained by the author,” adds Strothman.</li>
<li>Double-check the reversion of rights clause and insert a minimum number of annual sales for a work to be deemed “in print,” suggests The Author’s Guild.</li>
<li>Agents and publishers are in battle mode over enhanced e-books and there is no standard yet. A big question is whether they will be classified separately from regular e-books. Many publishers want these rights, but most agents are trying to retain them.</li>
<li>Read the fine print regarding the format of book. If the publisher is considering publishing straight to e-book, you want to be aware of that.</li>
</ol>
<p>Don’t rush into anything. The e-book market is uncertain and changing.</p>
<p><strong>What royalties should I expect?</strong></p>
<p>Most publishers (“about 90 percent” according to Liss) are offering rates of 25 percent of net receipts for e-books. <a href="http://www.authorsguild.org/advocacy/articles/random-house-harpercollins-look-to-lock-in.html " target="_blank">The Author’s Guild</a> thinks these are low and suggests ways to protect you if industry standards change: First, because the market is changing so quickly, don’t lock yourself into a rate. Try to obtain the unconditional right to renegotiate after a period of, say, two years. Second, negotiate for a royalty floor. Insist that your royalty amount for e-books will never fall below the royalty amount for the hardcover edition of your work.</p>
<p><strong>Do books ever go straight to e-book?</strong></p>
<p>You can self-publish straight to an e-book. The advantages are obvious: no rejection letters from editors, no distribution costs, no royalties to an agent. Plus, you’ll get marketing for you or your business. The disadvantages are that—unless you are a jack-of-all-trades—you must now pay someone to copyedit, proofread, design your cover, market, advertise, and publicize. And you don’t have the advice and expertise of editors and designers. There are many sites on-line that offer self-publishing services including Amazon.com and Lulu.com. Or you can set up PayPal on your own Web site. Publishers have started publishing a few books straight to e-book. According to Gompertz, this is still experimental. Simon &amp; Schuster published a book straight to e-book because it was topical, but then published it as a regular book.</p>
<p><strong>Are there any pitfalls to e-books?</strong></p>
<p>Piracy. It happens. If you are self-publishing and want to make sure that nobody steals your content, copyright every page or install PDF security features. If you are working with a publisher, check with them about protecting your content.</p>
<p>The other pitfall? Things can go wrong, Orwellian wrong, like in 2009 <a href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-13860_3-10289983-56.html" target="_blank">when Amazon removed </a><em><a href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-13860_3-10289983-56.html" target="_blank">1984</a></em> from people’s Kindles.</p>
<p><strong>What’s the lowdown on the pricing of e-books?</strong></p>
<p>There’s been a lot of press about e-books<strong>, </strong>but a little history might help. It all started with Amazon and its Kindle and an e-book price of $9.99.  Amazon and the publishers used a <strong>wholesale model,</strong> whereby publishers would sell the books to Amazon at about half the list price and then Amazon would set the Kindle price. So, if a book was priced at $24.95, Amazon would pay the publisher $12.50. But since the online giant was charging $9.99, it was actually losing money ($2.50) on the e-book. It didn’t matter to Amazon because it was making up for it in Kindle sales. In the process, however, consumers got used to paying that lower price.</p>
<p>This price started a dispute between Amazon and publishers because, as Mark Gompertz points out, “publishers are against devaluing content.” Two years of disagreement led to Amazon temporarily removing the “buy” button from Macmillan books in January, although they were still offered on the site by third parties. Eventually a resolution was reached; soon an e-book on Amazon will be priced at $12.99 to $14.99.</p>
<p>Then publishers came to a pricing agreement with Apple, known as an <strong>agency model</strong>, for the downloading of e-books on the iPad.  Apple will give publishers 70 percent of the consumer price, which the publishers set. But Apple wants a guarantee from the publishers that no other retailer will sell e-books for less then their iBookstore price. Consequently publishers and Amazon are back at the negotiating table. Now, according to<a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/03/18/technology/internet/18amazon.html" target="_blank"> </a><em><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/03/18/technology/internet/18amazon.html" target="_blank">The New York Times</a></em>,<em> </em>Amazon is insisting that publishers sign a three-year contract guaranteeing that no other competitor will get lower prices or better terms.  Mark Gompertz says, “We felt like we were losing ground, but now we have possibility because of competition.”</p>
<p>Next up, Google. Publishers are currently in discussion with the Internet giant over its plans to enter the e-book world. Because of the Amazon and Apple discussions, Google is now open to talking about an <strong>agency model</strong> and to paying publishers 70 percent of each sale, according to Mokoto Rich of <em>The New York Times</em>.</p>
<p>For the moment, publishers and e-retailers have devised a formula that works. But if e-book sales outpace hardcover sales—or if bookstores can’t compete—the equation might not work. This would mean that publishers aren’t making the money they need to acquire, edit, design, support, and promote books. And, as Jonathan Galassi wrote in <em><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/01/03/opinion/03galassi.html" target="_blank">The New York Times</a>,</em> “An e-book distributor is not a publisher, but rather a purveyor of work that has already been created.”</p>
<p>So, check regularly. The offerings at this bazaar change daily&#8211;new vendors, new products, new prices, and new customers. I’ll do without enhanced pomegranates, though. I like them just the way they are.</p>
<p><em>{Formerly a book editor at Viking/Penguin and Simon &amp; Schuster in New York City, Sarah Baker is now a freelance writer and an independent producer for Word of Mouth on New Hampshire Public Radio. She lives in Cambridge, Massachusetts.}</em></p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>Sources:</strong></span></p>
<p>Motoko Rich, <em>The New York Times</em>, &#8220;<a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/03/18/technology/internet/18amazon.html" target="_blank">Amazon Threatens Publishers as Apple Looms</a>&#8221;</p>
<p>Douglas MacMillan, <em>Business Week</em>, &#8220;<a href="http://www.businessweek.com/technology/content/jan2010/tc20100111_277237.htm" target="_blank">E-Readers Everywhere: The Inevitable Shakeout</a>&#8221;</p>
<p>Motoko Rich, <em>The New York Times</em>, &#8220;<a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/03/01/business/media/01ebooks.html" target="_blank">Math of Publishing Meets the E-Book</a>&#8221;</p>
<p><em>Jim Milliot, Publisher’s Weekly</em> <a href="http://www.publishersweekly.com/article/450299-E_Book_Sales_Jump_176_in_Flat_Trade_Year.php?rssid=20796&amp;q=e-book+sales" target="_blank">E-Book Sales Jump 176 % in Flat Trade Year</a>&#8221;</p>
<p><em>Louisa Ermelino, Publisher’s Weekly</em> <a href="http://www.publishersweekly.com/article/451639-PW_s_Panel_on_Going_from_Book_to_e_Book.php?rssid=20796" target="_blank">PW&#8217;s Panel on Going from Book to e-Book</a></p>
<p>Nicholson Baker, <em>The New Yorker</em>, &#8220;<a href="http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2009/08/03/090803fa_fact_baker" target="_blank">A New Page</a>&#8221;</p>
<p>Jonathan Galassi, <em>The New York Times</em>, &#8220;<a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/03/01/business/media/01ebooks.html" target="_blank">There&#8217;s More to Publishing than Meets the Screen</a>&#8221;</p>
<p>Geoffrey A. Fowler, <em>The Wall Street Journal</em>, &#8220;<a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704854904574644491659206478.html" target="_blank">More Makers Jump into the E-Reader Market</a>&#8221;</p>
<p><span style="font-family: Verdana; font-size: x-small;">Ina Fried, CNET News, &#8220;</span><span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman'; font-size: small;"><span style="font-family: Verdana; font-size: x-small;"><a href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-13860_3-10289983-56.html" target="_blank">Amazon recalls (and embodies) Orwell&#8217;s &#8216;1984&#8242;</a>&#8220;</span></span></p>
<p>Steven Pearlstein, <em>The Washington Post</em>, &#8220;<a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/02/02/AR2010020203910.html" target="_blank">The Amazon-Macmillan book saga heralds publishing&#8217;s progress</a>&#8221;</p>
<p>Sarah Weinman, <em>Daily Finance</em>, &#8220;<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/story/media/enhanced-e-books-a-boon-for-readers-a-headache-for-agents/19400500/" target="_blank">Enhanced e-books</a>&#8221;</p>
<p>Kevin Kelly, <em>The New York Times Magazine</em>, &#8220;<a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2006/05/14/magazine/14publishing.html?_r=1&amp;pagewanted=all" target="_blank">Scan This Book!</a>&#8220;</p>


<p>Related posts:<ol><li><a href='http://www.sinandsyntax.com/sin-and-syntax-salon/on-bucks-and-books/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Constance Hale on Bucks and Book Publishing'>Constance Hale on Bucks and Book Publishing</a></li>
<li><a href='http://www.sinandsyntax.com/blog/constance-hale-on-demystifying-books/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Demystifying Books'>Demystifying Books</a></li>
<li><a href='http://www.sinandsyntax.com/sin-and-syntax-salon/sarah-baker-on-the-art-of-writing-free/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Sarah Baker on the Art of Writing Free'>Sarah Baker on the Art of Writing Free</a></li>
</ol></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.sinandsyntax.com/sin-and-syntax-salon/e-to-z-on-e-books/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>E-books, twit wit, and Susan Orlean</title>
		<link>http://www.sinandsyntax.com/blog/e-books-twit-wit-and-susan-orlean/</link>
		<comments>http://www.sinandsyntax.com/blog/e-books-twit-wit-and-susan-orlean/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jan 2010 19:30:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Constance Hale</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Carr]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e-books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jonathan Galassi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York Times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shelly Runyon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Susan Orlean]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sinandsyntax.com/?p=489</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Didja catch two fascinating articles in last Sunday’s New York Times? In the Op-Ed pages, Farrar, Straus &#038; Giroux publisher Jonathan Galassi writes about the heroic—and hidden—work behind great literature, and about the myopia of those infatuated with the idea of e-books.

David Carr, in “Why Twitter Will Endure,” confesses his own infatuation with Twitter.

In Talking Story, Shelly Runyon writes about the Twitter feed of Susan Orlean, and what it tells us about Orlean’s particular brand of short-burst communication. 
 


Related posts:<ol><li><a href='http://www.sinandsyntax.com/talking-story/shelly-runyon-on-twit-wit-and-chick-lit/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Shelly Runyon on Twit Wit and Chick Lit'>Shelly Runyon on Twit Wit and Chick Lit</a></li>
<li><a href='http://www.sinandsyntax.com/blog/a-lists-e-books-and-the-ipad/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: A-lists, e-books, and the iPad'>A-lists, e-books, and the iPad</a></li>
</ol>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Didja catch two fascinating articles in last Sunday’s <em>New York Times</em>? <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/01/03/opinion/03galassi.html" target="_blank">In the Op-Ed pages</a>, Farrar, Straus &amp; Giroux publisher Jonathan Galassi writes about the heroic—and hidden—work behind great literature, and about the myopia of those infatuated with the idea of e-books.</p>
<p>David Carr, in “<a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/01/03/weekinreview/03carr.html" target="_blank">Why Twitter Will Endure</a>,” confesses his own infatuation with Twitter, and defies conventional notions about that brand of social media. He sees the possibility of narrative in “short-burst communication” and applauds the economy and precision forced by text messages. But he concedes that “the real value of the service is listening to a wired collective voice.”</p>
<p>In <a href="http://www.sinandsyntax.com/talking-story/" target="_blank">Talking Story</a>, Shelly Runyon writes about the Twitter feed of Susan Orlean, and what it tells us about Orlean’s particular brand of short-burst communication. For you doubters who snicker at the Morse-Code-like rhythms of Twitter and insist that Tweet feeds are fluff, Orlean may change your mind. The author of <em>The Orchid Thief</em> proves two things about micro-narrative: first, that it is possible to tell stories in 140 characters; second, that it takes a damn good writer to do it.</p>


<p>Related posts:<ol><li><a href='http://www.sinandsyntax.com/talking-story/shelly-runyon-on-twit-wit-and-chick-lit/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Shelly Runyon on Twit Wit and Chick Lit'>Shelly Runyon on Twit Wit and Chick Lit</a></li>
<li><a href='http://www.sinandsyntax.com/blog/a-lists-e-books-and-the-ipad/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: A-lists, e-books, and the iPad'>A-lists, e-books, and the iPad</a></li>
</ol></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.sinandsyntax.com/blog/e-books-twit-wit-and-susan-orlean/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
