<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Sin and Syntax &#187; narrative journalism</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sinandsyntax.com/tag/narrative-journalism/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sinandsyntax.com</link>
	<description>An online salon for those who love wicked good prose.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 14:05:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Best of narrative journalism (books)</title>
		<link>http://www.sinandsyntax.com/online-and-on-the-shelf/best-of-narrative-journalism-books/</link>
		<comments>http://www.sinandsyntax.com/online-and-on-the-shelf/best-of-narrative-journalism-books/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Apr 2010 16:22:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Constance Hale</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Online and on the Shelf]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[great nonfiction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[great writing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John McPhee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[literary nonfiction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[narrative journalism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sinandsyntax.com/?p=694</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Writers and editors throw the term narrative journalism around loosely, and many don’t really know how to define it. Here’s my own short definition: narrative journalism is reported nonfiction that uses the techniques of fiction to enliven the story.

Here is a sampling of some of the best works of narrative journalism that have been published in books.


Related posts:<ol><li><a href='http://www.sinandsyntax.com/talking-story/favorite-sites/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Where to find narrative journalism online'>Where to find narrative journalism online</a></li>
<li><a href='http://www.sinandsyntax.com/blog/e-books-twit-wit-and-susan-orlean/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: E-books, twit wit, and Susan Orlean'>E-books, twit wit, and Susan Orlean</a></li>
<li><a href='http://www.sinandsyntax.com/online-and-on-the-shelf/usage-guides/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Books on usage and abusage'>Books on usage and abusage</a></li>
</ol>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Writers and editors throw the term <em>narrative journalism</em> around loosely, and many don’t really know how to define it. Here’s my own short definition: narrative journalism is reported nonfiction that uses the techniques of fiction to enliven the story. Those techniques might include scene-setting, character sketches, and extended dialogue (rather than quotes gathered through interviews). A work of narrative journalism requires an artful structure that gives the story an arc or some kind of dramatic progression. The writer is present as a narrator and not just as an invisible, objective witness.</p>
<p>Here is a sampling of some of the best works of narrative journalism that have been published in books. (Get reading!)</p>
<p><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Collections of Narrative Journalism</span></strong></p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"> </span></p>
<p><strong><em>Notes of a Native Son</em></strong><em> </em>by James Baldwin. Beacon Press 1984 (original published in 1955).</p>
<p><strong><em>We Tell Ourselves Stories in Order to Live: Collected Non-fiction</em></strong> by Joan Didion. Everyman’s Library 2006</p>
<p><strong><em>The Heart That Bleeds: Latin America Now</em></strong><em> </em>by Alma Guillermoprieto. Vintage 1994.</p>
<p><strong><em>Talk Stories</em></strong><em> </em>by Jamaica Kincaid, with a foreword by Ian Frazier. Farrar, Straus and Giroux 2001.</p>
<p><strong><em>The Sweet Science</em></strong><em> </em>by A.J. Liebling. North Point Press 2004 (original, 1956).</p>
<p><strong><em>The John McPhee Reader</em></strong><em> </em>by John McPhee (Edited by William L. Howarth). Farrar, Straus and Giroux 1982.</p>
<p><strong><em>Fame and Obscurity</em></strong><em> </em>by Gay Talese. Ivy Books 1995 (original, 1970).</p>
<p><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Anthologies of Narrative Journalism </span></strong></p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"> </span></p>
<p><strong><em>The Best American Magazine Writing</em></strong><em> </em>edited by the American Society of Magazine Editors. Columbia University Press annual series</p>
<p><strong><em>Pulitzer Prize Feature Stories: America’s Best Writing 1979-2003</em></strong><em> </em>edited by David Garlock. Wiley-Blackwell 2003.</p>
<p><strong><em>The Art of Fact: A Historical Anthology of Literary Journalism</em></strong><em> </em>by Kevin Kerrane and Ben Yagoda. Scribner 1997.</p>
<p><strong><em>The Art of the Personal Essay: An Anthology from the Classical Era to the Present</em></strong><em> </em>edited by Phillip Lopate. Anchor 1997 (original, 1994).</p>
<p><strong><em>The Princeton Anthology of Writing</em></strong><em> </em>edited by John McPhee and Carol Rigolot. Princeton University Press 2001.</p>
<p><strong><em>Best American Essays of the Century</em></strong><em> </em>by Joyce Carol Oates and Robert Atwan. Houghton Mifflin 2000.</p>
<p><strong><em>Best Newspaper Writing</em></strong><strong> </strong>edited by the Poynter Institute. Poynter Institute Press annual series</p>
<p><strong><em>New York Stories: Landmark Writing from Four Decades of New York Magazine</em></strong><em> </em> edited by Tom Wolfe and the editors of <em>New York Magazine</em>. Random House 2008.</p>
<p><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Book-Length Works of Narrative Journalism </span></strong></p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"> </span></p>
<p><strong><em>Black Man’s America</em></strong><em> </em>by Simeon Booker. Prentice Hall, out of print (originally published in 1964).</p>
<p><strong><em>In Cold Blood</em></strong><em> </em>by Truman Capote. Vintage 1994 (first published in 1966).</p>
<p><strong><em>The Years of Lyndon Johnson</em></strong><em> </em>by Robert Caro. Alfred A. Knopf, three volumes to date (first volume originally published in 1982).</p>
<p><strong><em>Narrative of the Life of Frederick Douglass</em></strong> by Frederick Douglass. Available online at <a href="http://www.gutenberg.org/etext/23">www.gutenberg.org/etext/23</a> (original published in 1845).</p>
<p><strong><em>The Spirit Catches You and You Fall Down: A Hmong Child, Her American Doctors, and the Collision of Two Cultures</em></strong> by Anne Fadiman. Farrar, Straus and Giroux 1997.</p>
<p><strong><em>We Wish to Inform You that Tomorrow We Will be Killed With Our Families: Stories from Rwanda</em></strong><em> </em>by Philip Gourevitch. Picador 1998.</p>
<p><strong><em>The Best and the Brightest</em></strong><em> </em>by David Halberstam. Ballantine 1993 (original, 1972).</p>
<p><strong><em>Death in the Afternoon</em></strong><em> </em>by Ernest Hemingway. Scribner 1996 (original, 1932).</p>
<p><strong><em>Hiroshima</em></strong> by John Hersey. Vintage 1989 (originally published in 1946).</p>
<p><strong><em>King Leopold&#8217;s Ghost: A Story of Greed, Terror, and Heroism in Colonial Africa</em></strong><em> </em>by Adam Hochschild. Houghton Mifflin 1998.</p>
<p><strong><em>The Fatal Shore: The Epic of Australia&#8217;s Founding</em></strong><em> </em>by Robert Hughes. Vintage 1987.</p>
<p><strong><em>The Soul of a New Machine</em></strong><em> </em>by Tracy Kidder. Bay Back Books 2000 (original, 1981).</p>
<p><strong><em>Random Family: Love, Drugs, Trouble, and Coming of Age in the Bronx</em></strong><em> </em>by Adrian LeBlanc. Scribner 2003.</p>
<p><strong><em>Moneyball: The Art of Winning an Unfair Game</em></strong><em> </em>by Michael Lewis. W.W. Norton &amp; Co. 2003.</p>
<p><strong><em>The Soloist: A Lost Dream, an Unlikely Friendship, and the Redemptive Power of Music</em></strong><em> </em>by Steve Lopez. Putnam Adult 2008.</p>
<p><strong><em>Crossing Over: A Mexican Family on the Migrant Trail</em></strong><em> </em>by Ruben Martinez. Picador USA 2001.</p>
<p><strong><em>Speak, Memory</em></strong><em> </em>by Vladimir Nabokov. Vintage 1989 (original, 1966).</p>
<p><strong><em>The Orchid Thief</em></strong><em> </em>by Susan Orlean. Ballantine Books 1999.</p>
<p><strong><em>Cadillac Desert: The American West and Its Disappearing Water</em></strong><em> </em>by Marc Reisner. Penguin 1993 (original, 1986).</p>
<p><strong><em>The Making of the Atomic Bomb</em></strong><em> </em>by Richard Rhodes. Simon &amp; Schuster 1995 (original, 1986).</p>
<p><strong><em>Gulag Archipelago</em></strong><em> </em>by Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn,. Harper Perennial Modern Classics 2007 (full version originally published in 1989).</p>
<p><strong><em>Remembering Denny</em></strong><em> </em>by Calvin Trillin, with foreword by John Gregory Dunne. Farrar, Straus and Giroux 2005 (original, 1993).</p>
<p><strong><em>The Guns of August</em></strong><em> </em>by Barbara Tuchman. Presidio Press 2004 (original, 1962).</p>
<p><strong><em>Black Lamb and Grey Falcon</em></strong><em> </em>by Rebecca West. Penguin Classics 2007 (original, 1941).</p>
<p><strong><em>The Right Stuff</em></strong><em> </em>by Tom Wolfe. Picador 2008 (original, 1979).</p>


<p>Related posts:<ol><li><a href='http://www.sinandsyntax.com/talking-story/favorite-sites/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Where to find narrative journalism online'>Where to find narrative journalism online</a></li>
<li><a href='http://www.sinandsyntax.com/blog/e-books-twit-wit-and-susan-orlean/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: E-books, twit wit, and Susan Orlean'>E-books, twit wit, and Susan Orlean</a></li>
<li><a href='http://www.sinandsyntax.com/online-and-on-the-shelf/usage-guides/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Books on usage and abusage'>Books on usage and abusage</a></li>
</ol></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.sinandsyntax.com/online-and-on-the-shelf/best-of-narrative-journalism-books/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A-lists, e-books, and the iPad</title>
		<link>http://www.sinandsyntax.com/blog/a-lists-e-books-and-the-ipad/</link>
		<comments>http://www.sinandsyntax.com/blog/a-lists-e-books-and-the-ipad/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Apr 2010 15:31:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Constance Hale</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e-books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e-readers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lukas Prize]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[narrative journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[role of the narrator]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tips on writing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sinandsyntax.com/?p=646</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Some chewy bits and pieces to offer you this week. First, kudos to David Finkel, whose book The Good Soldiers was just named the recipient of the Anthony Lukas prize. I’ve long been an admirer of Finkel’s narrative journalism, which came to my attention when I edited the Nieman Foundation's Narrative Digest. The Good Soldiers offers an interesting counterpoint to The Forever War, by Dexter Filkins.

How will books like these fare in the future, as traditional publishing adapts to new technology? Read  about that and a list of tips from a writer/editor pal of mine in California.


Related posts:<ol><li><a href='http://www.sinandsyntax.com/blog/try-a-little-frisson-with-your-nonfiction/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Try a Little Frisson with Your Nonfiction'>Try a Little Frisson with Your Nonfiction</a></li>
<li><a href='http://www.sinandsyntax.com/blog/constance-hale-on-demystifying-books/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Demystifying Books'>Demystifying Books</a></li>
<li><a href='http://www.sinandsyntax.com/blog/e-books-twit-wit-and-susan-orlean/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: E-books, twit wit, and Susan Orlean'>E-books, twit wit, and Susan Orlean</a></li>
</ol>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some chewy bits and pieces to offer you this week. First, kudos to David Finkel, whose book <em><a href="http://www.amazon.com/Good-Soldiers-David-Finkel/dp/0374165734/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&amp;s=books&amp;qid=1270220496&amp;sr=1-1 " target="_blank">The Good Soldiers</a> </em>was just named the recipient of the Anthony Lukas prize. I’ve long been an admirer of Finkel’s narrative journalism, which came to my attention when I edited the Nieman Foundation&#8217;s <a href="http://www.nieman.harvard.edu/narrative/notable.aspx?id=100465" target="_blank">Narrative Digest</a>. <em>The Good Soldiers</em> offers an interesting counterpoint to <em><a href="http://www.amazon.com/reader/0307266397?_encoding=UTF8&amp;ref_=sib_dp_pt" target="_blank">The Forever War</a></em>, by Dexter Filkins.</p>
<p>Both books are examples of masterful war reporting, but they also make a study in contrasts about the role of the narrator in nonfiction storytelling. Finkel choses the third person, zooming on his soldier protagonists. (See this <em><a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/09/11/AR2009091102405.html" target="_blank">Washington Post</a></em><a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/09/11/AR2009091102405.html" target="_blank"> excerpt</a>.) Filkins, on the other hand, uses his book to write in a way that is impossible in his <em>New York Times</em> stories, as he explains in “<a href="http://www.prospect.org/cs/articles?article=upclose_and_personal_in_iraq" target="_blank">Up Close and Personal in Iraq</a>,” an article by Ankush Khardori in <em>The American Prospect</em>. Just read the first few pages of each, and you’ll notice the difference in point of view.</p>
<p>How will books like these fare in the future, as traditional publishing adapts to new technology? You may have seen the host of recent news articles about e-books, and you may even be considering buying a brand-new iPad. In the Sin and Syntax Salon, <a href="http://www.sinandsyntax.com/sin-and-syntax-salon/e-to-z-on-e-books/" target="_blank">Sarah Baker gives you the lowdown</a> on what she calls the “chaotic bazaar” of book publishing.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/03/31/books/31covers.html" target="_blank">Motoko Rich</a> also had an interesting (if oddly written—did anyone else think it went in circles?) article about how e-readers kill the fun of looking at what others are reading. Is the Kindle a conversation killer? I once sat next to a handsome guy on a plane who was reading <em><a href="http://www.amazon.com/Mambo-Kings-Play-Songs-Love/dp/1401310028/ref=sr_1_5?ie=UTF8&amp;s=books&amp;qid=1270220683&amp;sr=1-5" target="_blank">The Mambo Kings Play Songs of Love</a></em>. My asking how he liked the book kicked off a conversation that took us to Frankfurt. And it gave me a cool connection in Washington, D.C. (He was a staffer for Congressman John Conyers.)</p>
<p>OK, now back to our conversation about writing. I wanted to share <a href="http://womeninoverdrive.blogspot.com/2010/03/writerly-advice.html" target="_blank">some suggestions</a> from my California colleague Nora Isaacs, who is a terrific journalist as well as a freelance editor.</p>
<p>Nora is good on tips. I appreciated the ones in her book <em><a href="http://bit.ly/c1Xhei" target="_blank">Women in Overdrive</a></em>. And taking some of <em>those</em> tips to heart, I will stop writing and start assembling some literal bits and pieces for a dinner party tonight.</p>


<p>Related posts:<ol><li><a href='http://www.sinandsyntax.com/blog/try-a-little-frisson-with-your-nonfiction/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Try a Little Frisson with Your Nonfiction'>Try a Little Frisson with Your Nonfiction</a></li>
<li><a href='http://www.sinandsyntax.com/blog/constance-hale-on-demystifying-books/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Demystifying Books'>Demystifying Books</a></li>
<li><a href='http://www.sinandsyntax.com/blog/e-books-twit-wit-and-susan-orlean/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: E-books, twit wit, and Susan Orlean'>E-books, twit wit, and Susan Orlean</a></li>
</ol></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.sinandsyntax.com/blog/a-lists-e-books-and-the-ipad/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Try a Little Frisson with Your Nonfiction</title>
		<link>http://www.sinandsyntax.com/blog/try-a-little-frisson-with-your-nonfiction/</link>
		<comments>http://www.sinandsyntax.com/blog/try-a-little-frisson-with-your-nonfiction/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Nov 2009 16:04:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Constance Hale</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Talking Cardinal Sins & Carnal Pleasures]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Biography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[columbia journalism review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dave Cullen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Memoir]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[narrative journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nonfiction genres]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Notable books]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sinandsyntax.com/?p=418</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[An intriguing collection of unlike things ends up on the New York Times list of 100 notable books each year. A recent article in the Columbia Journalism Review about the blurring of fiction and nonfiction claims that nonfiction is losing its “frisson.” I hardly agree—see my essay in Talking Story—but if you need further convincing, go no further than the NYT’s top 100.

Here is the Connie Cull...


Related posts:<ol><li><a href='http://www.sinandsyntax.com/talking-story/is-true-fiction-just-true-fraud/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Is True Fiction Just True Fraud?'>Is True Fiction Just True Fraud?</a></li>
</ol>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An intriguing collection of unlike things ends up on the <em><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/gift-guide/holiday-2009/100-notable-books-of-2009-gift-guide/list.html" target="_blank">New York Times</a></em><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/gift-guide/holiday-2009/100-notable-books-of-2009-gift-guide/list.html" target="_blank"> list of 100 notable books</a> each year. A recent article in the <em>Columbia Journalism Review</em> about the blurring of fiction and nonfiction claims that nonfiction is losing its “frisson.” I hardly agree—see <a href="http://www.sinandsyntax.com/talking-story/is-true-fiction-just-true-fraud/" target="_blank">my essay in Talking Story</a>—but if you need further convincing, go no further than the NYT’s top 100.</p>
<p>Here is the Connie Cull:</p>
<p>I draw much inspiration from reading about the lives of writers and artists, and this year offers a good crop of such biographies, including <em>Cheever: A Life</em>, by Blake Bailey, <em>Raymond Carver: A Writer’s Life</em>, by Carol Sklenicka; <em>Dorothea Lange: A Life Beyond Limits</em>, by Linda Gordon; and <em>Flanner</em><em>y: A Life of Flannery O’Connor</em> by Brad Gooch. (“Witty, obsessed and almost inhumanly brave,” wrote Joy Williams in her review of this short story writer. “O’Connor was peculiar, her work even more so.”)</p>
<p>Some question whether memoir counts as journalism—or narrative journalism. I tend to include it in the broader category of nonfiction, and scrutinize the credibility of the authors. These two pass muster: <em>City Boy: My Life in New York During the 1960s and ’70s</em>, by Edmund White, and <em>Closing Time: A Memoir</em>, by Joe Queenan.</p>
<p>Then there’s the world of ideas, some of the hardest books to write for a lay audience. Robert Wright succeeded in <em>The Evolution of God</em>, as did the every-interesting Rebecca Solnit in <em>A Paradise Built in Hell: The Extraordinary Communities That Arise in Disaster.</em></p>
<p>For sheer drama—reported tales that read like a novel but tell us something important about our world—my picks are <em>Zeitoun</em>, by Dave Eggers (a pal from the early days of <em>Wired</em> and his then-magazine, <em>Might</em>), <em>The Lost City Of Z: A Tale of Deadly Obsession in the Amazon</em>, by David Grann (my newest favorite writer for his mastery of character and suspense), and <em>The Good Soldiers</em>, by David Finkel. (I’m cheating on that last one: it’s not on the <em>Times</em> Top 100, but I think it should be.)</p>
<p>And then there’s <em>Columbine</em>, by Dave Cullen, which does make the list. Cullen is a Denver journalist with whom I’ve stayed in touch since we both attended a Niemen Foundation seminar. Reviewer Jennifer Senior commends him for resisting narrative cliché (i.e., starting his tale 48 hours before the notorious killing spree of Eric Harris and Dylan Klebold, stopping the frame just before they fired their guns, and then spooling back to the very beginning, with the promise of trying to explain how the two boys got to this twisted pass). In my book this is reason enough for nomination. But narrative skill takes more than just resisting cliché. About the central surprise of the book Senior writes, “I expected a story about misfits exacting vengeance, because that was my memory of the media consensus — <em>Columbine, right, wasn’t there something going on there between goths and jocks?</em> In fact, Harris and Klebold were killing completely at random that day. Their victims weren’t the intended targets at all; the <em>entire school</em> was. Columbine, it turns out, was a failed attempt at domestic terrorism.”</p>
<p>How’s that for frisson?</p>


<p>Related posts:<ol><li><a href='http://www.sinandsyntax.com/talking-story/is-true-fiction-just-true-fraud/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Is True Fiction Just True Fraud?'>Is True Fiction Just True Fraud?</a></li>
</ol></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.sinandsyntax.com/blog/try-a-little-frisson-with-your-nonfiction/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is True Fiction Just True Fraud?</title>
		<link>http://www.sinandsyntax.com/talking-story/is-true-fiction-just-true-fraud/</link>
		<comments>http://www.sinandsyntax.com/talking-story/is-true-fiction-just-true-fraud/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Nov 2009 15:55:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Constance Hale</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Talking Story]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alissa Quart]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[columbia journalism review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[narrative journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nonfiction genres]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[true fiction]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sinandsyntax.com/?p=414</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A recent piece in the Columbia Journalism Review set me on edge. In “The Rise of True Fiction,” my colleague Alissa Quart writes about a trend she perceives in the literary landscape: “an increase in the blurring of neat and certain categories of ‘fiction’ and ‘nonfiction’ into something that we might call ‘true fiction.’”

I would recommend the essay to anyone practicing fiction, nonfiction, or memoir, with some caveats.



Related posts:<ol><li><a href='http://www.sinandsyntax.com/blog/try-a-little-frisson-with-your-nonfiction/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Try a Little Frisson with Your Nonfiction'>Try a Little Frisson with Your Nonfiction</a></li>
<li><a href='http://www.sinandsyntax.com/blog/critiquing-ken-burns/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Critiquing Ken Burns'>Critiquing Ken Burns</a></li>
</ol>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A recent piece in the <em>Columbia Journalism Review</em> set me on edge. In “<a href="http://www.cjr.org/feature/the_rise_of_true_fiction.php" target="_blank">The Rise of True Fiction</a>,” my colleague Alissa Quart writes about a trend she perceives in the literary landscape: “an increase in the blurring of neat and certain categories of ‘fiction’ and ‘nonfiction’ into something that we might call ‘true fiction.’”</p>
<p>I would recommend the essay to anyone practicing fiction, nonfiction, or memoir, with some caveats.</p>
<p>Quart launches her column by discussing <em>The Hurt Locker</em>, a fictional action-movie whose “forensic, formalist style” she writes, aligns it with documentaries or biopics. (The film is rooted in a deeply reported article originally published in <em>Playboy</em>, and its author worked hand-in-glove with the film’s director.) Then Quart mentions books whose authors do the deep reporting, then depart from strict facts in their books—for example, <em>A.D.: New Orleans after the Deluge</em>, by Josh Neufeld, <em>What Is the What</em>, by Dave Eggers, and <em>Half Broke Horses</em>, by Jeannette Walls. The latter calls her recent book about her grandmother a “true life novel.”</p>
<p>So far, I’m with Quart. The list of writers who report or conduct historical research and then write fiction based on real-life stories is long and broad: in addition to the trio Quart mentions (Orwell, Capote, Mailer), there are Mark Twain (whose reporting set up his satire), John Steinbeck (whose journalism informed <em>The Grapes of Wrath)</em>, and contemporary novelists whose deep historical research makes their fiction come alive, like David Guterson (<em>Snow Falling on Cedars</em>), and Ian McEwan (<em>Atonement</em>). And let’s not forget Shakespeare, whose history plays were based on the lives of English kings and used events like The Wars of the Roses as departure points.</p>
<p>It’s when Quart starts talking about nonfiction that I begin to quibble. Or, in certain cases, quake. She makes the surprising assertion that “the category ‘nonfiction’ no longer has the frisson it once did or the assurance that a book or film will sell.” Tell that to Dexter Filkins, whose balancing of journalistic restraint and downright eloquence found expression in <em>The Forever War</em>. Or to Anne Hull, whose reporting on Walter Reed won her the Pulitzer, among other awards. Or to Adam Hochschild, whose <em>King Leopold’s Ghost</em> hardly disappeared into remainder bins.</p>
<p>(And when has there ever been “assurance” that an important work of nonfiction would find a commercial audience?)</p>
<p>Quart, who is a fellow this year at the Nieman Foundation, where I teach narrative journalism, quotes another colleague, Andrea Pitzer, the editor of the <em>Narrative Digest: </em>“The newshole for narrative nonfiction is shrinking,” Pitzer says. “You have to have a lot of dazzle to get it published at all. Letting the work go over a little to fiction lets it be more salable.”</p>
<p>The newshole may indeed be shrinking, but no editor I know would prefer a piece, however dazzling, that departed from fact over one with startling news or insight. There is a big difference between letting work “go over a little to fiction” and borrowing the techniques of fiction, which is, I suspect, what Pitzer meant. (Full discloser: I was the editor of the Digest for two years; Pitzer succeeded me.)</p>
<p>But since when are those techniques—plotting a drama, crafting character, describing scenes, capturing dialogue, parceling out details to heighten suspense, finding a narrative voice—the province of fiction anyway? Most of us consider them just elements of great writing, any great writing.</p>
<p>Quart says hipster online editor Larry Smith suggests that the graphic novel <em>A.D.</em> is just journalism in a new guise, and she quotes John D’Agata, the editor of the new anthology <em>The Lost Origins of the Essay</em>, who asks “Do we read nonfiction in order to receive information, or do we read it to experience art?”</p>
<p>Perhaps the problem is the word <em>nonfiction</em>, which may be so broad as to blur some important lines. I would argue that we indeed read <em>journalism</em>—news stories, whether told in a straight news style or in an artful narrative style—for information, and we want that information to be credible and fair. We read <em>narrative journalism</em>—factual stories told using writerly (<em>not</em> fictional) techniques like plot, suspense, description, and artful language—for information, too; it tells us something important about our world. And we read <em>essays</em> and even <em>blogs</em> for the ideas of their writers. Art—and certainly artfulness—can surface into any of these forms, but the primary reason to read nonfiction is to learn factual truths about our world.</p>
<p><em>Memoir</em>, one the other hand, is a form that does slide away from reported facts and toward remembered impressions. That, indeed, we read for its emotional rather than factual truths.</p>
<p>In the end, perhaps we blur lines by lumping a variety of genres writing into the binary categories of “fiction” and “nonfiction.”</p>
<p><em>—Constance Hale</em></p>


<p>Related posts:<ol><li><a href='http://www.sinandsyntax.com/blog/try-a-little-frisson-with-your-nonfiction/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Try a Little Frisson with Your Nonfiction'>Try a Little Frisson with Your Nonfiction</a></li>
<li><a href='http://www.sinandsyntax.com/blog/critiquing-ken-burns/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Critiquing Ken Burns'>Critiquing Ken Burns</a></li>
</ol></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.sinandsyntax.com/talking-story/is-true-fiction-just-true-fraud/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Critiquing Ken Burns</title>
		<link>http://www.sinandsyntax.com/blog/critiquing-ken-burns/</link>
		<comments>http://www.sinandsyntax.com/blog/critiquing-ken-burns/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Oct 2009 21:07:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Constance Hale</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ken Burns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Klinkenborg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Modern Love]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[narrative arc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[narrative journalism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sinandsyntaxsalon.com/?p=230</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I’m fascinated with writing that uses the techniques of fiction to enliven nonfiction, whether in print, online, or on the radio or in documentary films.

Ken Burns is hard to ignore—not just because his The National Parks: America’s Best Idea preempted PBS prime-time programming last week—but also because he has the chops and the resources to do great narrative journalism. I mainly agreed with Mary McNamara’s LA Times review, but while watching endless footage of razorlike mountains and verdant plains, I couldn’t help muttering, “Does it have to be so long?” “Could the writing have more frisson?” “Can Ken Burns do tone that isn’t elegiac?”


No related posts.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I’m fascinated with writing that uses the techniques of fiction to enliven nonfiction, whether in print, online, over the radio or in documentary films.</p>
<p>Ken Burns is hard to ignore—not just because his <em>The National Parks: America’s Best Idea</em> preempted PBS prime-time programming last week—but also because he has the chops and the resources to do great narrative journalism. I mainly agreed with <a href="http://www.latimes.com/entertainment/news/la-et-ken-burns25-2009sep25,0,1920211.story" target="_blank">Mary McNamara’s </a><em><a href="http://www.latimes.com/entertainment/news/la-et-ken-burns25-2009sep25,0,1920211.story" target="_blank">LA Times</a></em><a href="http://www.latimes.com/entertainment/news/la-et-ken-burns25-2009sep25,0,1920211.story" target="_blank"> review</a>, but while watching endless footage of razorlike mountains and verdant plains, I couldn’t help muttering, “Does it have to be so <em>long</em>?” “Could the writing have more frisson?” “Can Burns do tone that isn’t elegiac?”</p>
<p>As editor of the Nieman Foundation’s <em>Narrative Digest</em>, I once wrote a column called<a href="http://www.nieman.harvard.edu/narrative/corner.aspx?id=100023" target="_blank"> “Narrative” Is Not a Synonym for “Long.”</a> In it I offered examples of some who write tight but still trace a narrative arc:  Charlie LeDuff, in “<a href="http://www.detnews.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20090128/METRO08/901280491 " target="_blank">Frozen in Indifference,”</a> published in <em>The Detroit News, </em>keeps his focus pointed and poignant. Matthew Parker’s <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/01/25/fashion/25love.html" target="_blank">“A Student of Intimacy, Step by Step”</a> is one of many examples in the Modern Love column of the Sunday <em>The New York </em>Times. Another Sunday <em>Times</em> short narrative I hate to miss is Verlyn Klinkenborg’s, <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/09/17/opinion/17thu4.html" target="_blank">“The Rural Life.”</a></p>
<p>Touché to Burns for stretching our attention spans, but the dude needs a tough editor. Some of the footage is so familiar as to be predictable (like Marian Anderson and Martin Luther King, Jr. on the steps of the Lincoln Memorial). Internal repetitions need paring, especially when interviewees echo each other. Then there are the musical schemes, fresh in <em>The Civil War</em> but hackneyed now.</p>
<p>In one voiceover, a park lover comments on the “artistic restraint” of wolves in the wilderness. We all need some of that artistic restraint.</p>


<p>No related posts.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.sinandsyntax.com/blog/critiquing-ken-burns/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
