<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is True Fiction Just True Fraud?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sinandsyntax.com/talking-story/is-true-fiction-just-true-fraud/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sinandsyntax.com/talking-story/is-true-fiction-just-true-fraud/</link>
	<description>An online salon for those who love wicked good prose.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2010 01:15:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Andrea Pitzer</title>
		<link>http://www.sinandsyntax.com/talking-story/is-true-fiction-just-true-fraud/comment-page-1/#comment-259</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrea Pitzer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 20:34:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sinandsyntax.com/?p=414#comment-259</guid>
		<description>Hi, Connie, 

A little background on my comments for Alissa Quart&#039;s CJR piece, which were specifically related to authors producing researched fiction rather than journalism. As you guessed, I was in no way advocating that journalists make the leap to fiction. The salability reference was taken from a larger discussion about what impressions, false or true, might be motivating some writers to cross over. Not surprisingly, I remain a fan of well-researched, well-written narrative nonfiction.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, Connie, </p>
<p>A little background on my comments for Alissa Quart&#8217;s CJR piece, which were specifically related to authors producing researched fiction rather than journalism. As you guessed, I was in no way advocating that journalists make the leap to fiction. The salability reference was taken from a larger discussion about what impressions, false or true, might be motivating some writers to cross over. Not surprisingly, I remain a fan of well-researched, well-written narrative nonfiction.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Try a Little Frisson with Your Nonfiction &#124; Sin and Syntax</title>
		<link>http://www.sinandsyntax.com/talking-story/is-true-fiction-just-true-fraud/comment-page-1/#comment-253</link>
		<dc:creator>Try a Little Frisson with Your Nonfiction &#124; Sin and Syntax</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Nov 2009 16:04:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sinandsyntax.com/?p=414#comment-253</guid>
		<description>[...] of fiction and nonfiction claims that nonfiction is losing its “frisson.” I hardly agree—see my essay in Talking Story—but if you need further convincing, go no further than the NYT’s top [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] of fiction and nonfiction claims that nonfiction is losing its “frisson.” I hardly agree—see my essay in Talking Story—but if you need further convincing, go no further than the NYT’s top [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
